Information about Dalhousie Himachal Pradesh

Dalhousie
Dalhousie

A British Resident had been entrusted with full authority to control the duties of every department, and with the power to occupy any fort or military post. Lord Hardinge had just concluded peace with the remnants of Ranjit Singh’s Estate. He had been forced into a war not of his own seeking. The one-eyed Sikh ruler died in 1839 and the huge army he had created became uncontrollable when his restraining hand was withdrawn. They formed ‘panchayats’ in every regiment and obeyed no other power, deposing the men in authority. Anarchy and chaos followed. Maharani Jinda’s brother was murdered short after a summary trial before hostile military panchayats. In November 1845, the Sikh army consisting of 60,000 soldiers, 40,000 armed followers and 150 guns crossed the Sutlej into British India. Commander Lal Singh lost the first two battles and Tel Singh the third, in 1846, after blowing up the bridge to prevent the escape of his own men. The British lost 2,000 troops killed and wounded.

“The river was alive with struggling mass of men. The artillery, now brought down to the water’s edge, completed the slaughter. Few escaped; none surrendered. The Sikhs met their fate with resignation.”

The British were moderate in their peace terms, the Sikh state was dismembered but the independence of the Punjab was respected. The portion between the Beas and the sutlej was ceded and an indemnity of one million and a half sterling was paid. The Resident, Sir Henry Lawrence was a courteous and kindly man, but he, too, left after the departure of Lord Hardinge, on grounds of health. The young Maharaja Dalip gingh was a Ward of the British Government who were to protect him till he reached the age of 16 in 1854.

Dalhousie
Dalhousie

Trouble, fanned by the Maharani Jinda, started in Multan when the Dewan Mulraj murdered to British officers who had come to take an accounting of his stewardship. Lord Dalhousie declined to stamp out the rebellion which soon spread. Maharani Jinda was banished to Benares- -this made matters worse. In November 1848, seven months after the Multan outbreak, Lord Gough moved to recoup the British position and supress the Sikh revolt. Three battles were again fought and at Jhallianwala, after a bloody battle, the British retreated. The defeat was short lived, the British, under Sir Charles Napier retrieved their position at Rawalpindi; Dalip Singh was dethroned and in December 1848, Lord Dalhousie declared that the “British army had entered Lahore, not as an enemy of the constituted government but to restore order and obediance.”

Also Visit – Also Visit – Dalhousie Dharamshala Amritsar Tour packages offer by swan tours Delhi at best price

Faced with more battles, Lord Dalhousie, whose health had begun to deteriorate, sought peace and quiet. In between the wars with the Burmese emperor, he visited the Punjab, and during one of his sojourns in the hill, chanced on this charming spot that was to bear his name. It was in 1850, when the Punjab was being reorganized under the direction of Dalhousie himself. The administration was elastic and untiring with heavy demands on his energy and devotion. The days of the men on the spot were spent in the saddle under the burning sun and nights in writing reports by the lights of candles stuck in beer bottles. The consolidator of British raj fell in love with it and arrangements were immediately made with the Rajah of Chamba for the lease of the locale. He had gone to the sylvan retreat for a ramble, and escape, he stayed to built.

Dalhousie
Dalhousie

Named after the Governor General, himself the first settlers there were the members of his staff and the administrators of the Punjab. British style huts and bungalows came up and by 1854 it was a fully fledged hill station. After eight years of continuous work in India, Lord Dalhousie’s health began to take a heavy toll–he was prematurely old and, at the age of 43, being scarcely able to walk due to recurring illness. Wars and annexations of other states kept him away from his beloved ‘hill station’, he made occasional visits when he could, the last in 1855, just before his departure. Two years later, partly on account of his annexations of eight large kingdoms or states, the war of 1857 broke out. Controversy raged, and still does, in history books, over his ruthless ambitions for the consolidations of empire, but over one act–there is no recrimination–the founding of Dalhousie.

After the proclamation of Queen Victoria as the Empress of India, and the beginning of the Empire period for India, Dalhousie got into full swing, with large influxes of British Army personnel escaping the soaring heat of the plains; besides charming bungalows, convent schools run by Catholic nuns and Irish Jesuits, came up providing British style education to the children. After a few years, wealthy Indians and government officials sent their children there and still doing spite of stiff admission requirements. As the years rolled on, Dalhousie began to attract the elite of the Punjab, providing an alternate to stiff and official Shimla. It reached its high point in the “Roaring Twenties”, followed by the “Gay Thirties”, when the elite of Lahore ‘cafe society’ flocked to the scenic and quiet resort. Elegant hotels came into existence for their enjoyment, while their children were sent to the schools where they were imparted a solid education, amidst cool breezes. During the forties, its popularity increased even more and Dalhousie was bursting at the seams. Gothic and neo-Gothic structures arose and the society was alive with lavish garden parties, practically every day.

However, with the independence in 1947, and due to the scattering of the rich of the Punjab, Dalhousie saw lean days. The cheapest hill resort in India, even in its heyday, it was less expensive than some of the better known stations in the Himalayas The post -Independence partition greatly reduced the number of visitors but not the amenities offered. In 1954 the City Fathers organised celebrations for its centenary and Prime Minister Nehru was requested to inaugurate the event and add a filip tc the sagging town. The Prime Minister chided the gentry for making the beautiful hill resort into a city and followed up his admonition with a “let us go to the Himalaya” call. It had the desired effect and there was an upsurge of visitors, including other classes besides, the elite who had made it, their domain.

In 1959, Tibet was taken over including large numbers of Lama by China. The Tibetans, and, at the instance of the Prime limed their country to India, mister, Dalhousie was selected to receive the exodus. WM their intrinsic artistic sense, and the great many craftsmen who came in the influx, Dalhousie got an injection of added charm. Mingled with the lovely scenery were tributes to the greater glory of God. Along the main roads they carved out giant frescoes and relief paintings. Doorways and roofs were beautifield in Tibetan style and rounding the bend, at a number of places, one chanced upon an Avaloketeshwara Buddha or lotus and every where the legend “Om Mani Padme Hum” – God rules every being, every place. Lamas, in their traditional robes, could be seen chanting prayers or conducting philosophical discussions in improvised monasteries.

The population was, however, indifferent and unappreciative of these master craftsmen who added beauty to the elegance, giving individuality to the roads chock full of fashion-able shops, and several chic hotels and restaurants. They moved on to Dharamsala, Dalhousie’s loss was Dharamsala’s gain.

For more information about Dalhousie and Himachal Pradesh tour packages contact Swan Tours Delhi one of the leading travel agents in India.

Brief History and information about Himachal Pradesh

History and information about Himachal Pradesh
History and information about Himachal Pradesh

Brief History and information about Himachal Pradesh

The period that followed Harsha, experienced the greatest power vacuum in India. His death had weakened the bonds which restrained the disruptive forces. The entire country was pushed to a state of anarchical autonomy. Himachal areas were no exception. The dissensions between local petty chiefs invited outside interference. Rajput princes, who had to leave their own states due to pressures or who came in search of new adventures, appeared on the scene. The old Ranas and Thakurs disappeared or became tributaries and in their places were installed new ones by sword and deceit. Some old Ranas and Thakurs continued for some years, owing nominal allegiance to the new Rajas, who finally emerged as the supreme authority with the passage of time. From the genealogical records and from other evidence, it appears that most of the hill states were already formed before the twelfth century. Some of them as Brah-mapura (Brahmaur), Kuluta (Kulu), Spiti and Srughna (ap-proximately Sirmur area) were, however, in existence for quite some centuries and these are mentioned by Hiuen Tsang as also in the earlier records.

Kangra formed part of the Trigarta Shashtha of jalandhara since very early times of Indian history. As a result of the Hun invasion and the incursions by many tribes later the plains were cut off from the hilly areas. The hilly areas constituted a separate state with its capital at Nagarkot or Kangra. With the passage of time from this state sprang the offshoots of Jaswan, Guler, Siba and Datarpur; Jaswan was formed in A.D. 1170 and Guler in A.D. 1405.

Nurpur was founded in about A.D. 1000 by Jethpal, a Tomar Rajput. Its capital was Pratisthan (Pathankot).

According to Panini, Chamba was a `Janapada’ under the name of Brahmagupta and it formed part of Trigarta Shashtha. It became a state sometime in the sixth century and in A.D. 680, a powerful king, Manu Verman, ruled it. Originally, its area was limited to Brahmaur. King Shail Verman extended its boundaries and founded the city of Chamba in A.D. 920.

According to Hiuen Tsang, Kulu was about 75 miles in circuit and was surrounded by high mountains. Raja Brahmpal ruled it in A.D. 500.

Raja Bir Sen, whose ancestors fled from Bengal in the wake of Muslim invasion, founded Suket in A.D. 1288. His brother, Girisen, founded Keonthal.

Mandi state is an offshoot of Suket and was founded by Ban Sen in the fourteenth century. The town of Mandi was built by Ajber Sen in 1527.

Kutlehar was founded by a Brahman, Jaspal, who ranked as a Rajput. Another state Banghal, was similarly founded by another Brahman, Prithipal, in A.D. 1200.

Bir Chand from Chanderi in Bundelkhand, after defeat-ing the local Thakurs in the Sutlej valley, founded the state of Bilaspur (Kehloor) in about A.D. 900. Its capital was Naina Devi at first but it was later shifted to Bilaspur. Nalagarh is an offshoot of Bilaspur and was founded by Ajai Chand a scion of the Kehlur Rajas.

Bushahar was one of the largest states in Himachal. Evidence regarding its foundation is inconclusive. Its ancient seat was Kamru in Baspa valley and was shifted to Sarahan. The Raja of Bushahar defeated the joint forces of Tibet and Ladakh and by a treaty in the seventeenth century pushed the territories of Tibet to its present boundaries. In this he had the support of the Moghul court.

Sirmur was founded by Raja Rasalu, son of Raja Salvahan of Jaisalmer, its area being approximately the same as under the ancient kingdom of Srugna. Its earlier capital, Sirmuri Tal was washed away by the floods in Giri River in the 12th century and later Nahan became the headquarters of the state. Jubbal, Balson, Ratesh were the offshoots of Sirmur.

With the exception of Kangra, Kulu, Bushahar and Chamba, the other states were founded by Rajput adventurers from the plains between the eighth and twelfth centuries and even in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Of the rest, Mandi, Suket, Sirmur and Nurpur were bigger states while the remaining were small principalities, mostly Thakurais. There were 30 Thakurais, divided into two groups of 12 and 18, Barah Thakurai and Atharah Thakurai which were respectively located in lower Shimla hills and in the valleys of Tons, Pabar and Sutlej rivers. These were Keonthal, Baghat, Kuthar, Kunihar, Bhajji, Dhami, Mehlog, Koti, Mangal, Beja, Bharoli and Baghal of the first group and Jubbal, Sari, Rawingarh, Balson, Ratesh, Ghund, Madhan, Theog, Kumarsain, Khneti, Dela th, Karangla, Kotkhai-Kotgarh, Darkoti, Tharoch, Dhadi, Sangri and Dodra Kawar of the second group.

These states were preoccupied with perpetual wars with one another. But these wars were not usually fought to the finish. Being of the same race or clan and also mostly connected by matrimony, the Rajas, Ranas and Thakurs were content to make the other his tributary. Moreover, the nature of the terrain allowed them to fight only limited wars. A battle or two ensued and that led the states to the exhaustion of their resources. Manpower was scanty as population was thin and scattered. It was mostly through a show of force and pomp and glory instead of actual clash of arms, that a chieftain tried to overawe the other. Bloody and destructive wars were few and deceit and diplomacy were the other means resorted to. It was for these reasons that the rulers usurped most of the state finances, which were meager, and spent them on their own households and pompous living.

Their great forts and magnificent palaces at impressive heights, surrounded by the miserable looking shanties of their subjects are memorials to the forced labour (begar) they extracted from them. In the hills the lands were the prerogative of the crown. As such, the select, irrigated and finest portions of land in valleys belonged to the Raja personally, while the people had to struggle and cut terraces in rocky hill-sides to make land cultivable to eke out a living. Even the results of their labour, the small fields, were not under their control. Land is life in the hills and the land belonged to the Raja. He thus controlled everything, life, security, wealth, and prestige. People owed him implicit allegiance and his authority was complete—personal, feudal and religious.

The economy of these states depended on their natural resources and the way the rulers developed them. Size, forests and trade routes determined the economy of these principalities. The rulers vied with one another in the exhibition of pomp and show, the smaller ones overreaching their means in aping the bigger ones. Consequently, they ran into debts and extorted still more from their subjects to pay the loans off. As such, the smaller the state, the more under-developed it remained, barring one or two exceptions where the rulers were enlightened. Only a few of them had annual revenue of more than Rupees six Lakhs.

For more information about Himachal Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh tour package from Delhi India contact Swantour.com